Is the Nature of Mathematics a Wicked Question?

by Lisa Kimball

At the Eighth International Conference on Complex Systems in June, an entertaining late-night conversation among participants centered on whether the principles of complexity science are a human invention or some basic truth we’ve simply discovered as we’ve learned more about the world. 

This echos a debate that’s been raging in the field of mathematics for years. In the August 2011 issue of Scientific American, Mark Livio explores this question, “Is math an invented set of tools, as Einstein believed? Or does it actually exist in some abstract realm, with humans merely discovering its truths?”

He writes that we accept the view that mathematics is the language of science and expect that it grammar explains experimental results and even predicts novel phenomena. He quotes Albert Einstein who said, “How is it possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” Livio describes the way that math captures the natural world as”uncanny.” In the end, he concludes that “mathematics is an intricate fusion of inventions and discoveries.”

How can we credit the power of mathematics to capture critical aspects of the world to help us understand it while appreciating the capacity of mathematicians to produce new knowlesdge that helps us create it?

It’s a wicked question. In The Daily Galaxy, Josh Hill raises questions that challenge both sides of the issue. For those who believe these mathematical truths are purely discoverable, where, exactly, are you looking? 

And for those on the other side of the court, why cannot a mathematician simply announce to the world that he has invented 2 + 2 to equal 5? “If a mathematical theory goes undiscovered, does it truly exist? Maybe this will be the next “does a tree falling in the forest make any sound if no one is there to hear it?”

Roger Penrose, one of the world’s most distinguished mathematicians says, “I like to think of mathematics as a bit like geology or archeology, where you’re really exploring beautiful things out there in the world, which have been out there, in fact, for ages and ages and ages, and you’re revealing them for the first time.”

Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek believes that “Inventions have to come from somewhere so they could be inspired by natural phenomena. … You can invent [all kinds of] axioms, but most of them won’t be interesting. And the ones that are interesting are discoveries, so even the inventions have some element of discovery. So as I said, mathematics is more discovered than invented, and this only makes it more so.” 

This debate is a great example of what Plexus Advisor, Scott Kelso calls a “complementary pair.” Mathematics – and complexity science – could be seen as both discovered and invented. Kelso has developed an empirically-based scientific theory of how the polarized world and the world in between can be reconciled.

Kelso and his collaborator, David A. Engstrom, coined the term “squiggle sense” to describe the sense of the inextricable, complementary dance of contraries. The notion of the ‘dance’ goes beyond the familiar notion of “both/and” inherent in wicked questions to highlight the importance of the dynamic relationship between the ideas.

This fits with Livio’s conclusion about the nature of mathematics, “A pattern emerges: humans invent mathematical concepts by way of abstracting elements from the world around them – shapes, lines, sets, groups, and so forth – either for some specific purpose or simply for fun. They then go on to discover the connections among those concepts.”

The DOC Squiggearium
TMM

Nursing~negligence

Only nursing, only negligence, either nursing or negligence, both nursing and negligence, nursing changing to negligence, negligence changing to nursing, between nursing and negligence, neithe nursing nor negligence, beyond nursing and negligence…

Essay by Daniel Pesut

TMM

mingling~opposition

Only mingling, only opposition, either mingling or opposition, both mingling and opposition, mingling changing to opposition, opposition changing to mingling, between mingling and opposition, neither mingling nor opposition, beyond mingling and opposition…

TMM

contraria~complementa

Only contraria, only complementa, either contraria or complementa, both contraria and complementa, contraria changing to complementa, complementa changing to contraria, between contraria and complementa, neither contraria nor complementa, beyond contraria and complementa… ~;)

TMM

analysis~synthesis

Only analysis, only synthesis, either analysis or synthesis, both analysis and synthesis, analysis changing to synthesis, synthesis changing to analysis, between analysis and synthesis, neither analysis nor synthesis, beyond analysis and synthesis…

TMM

CD~levels

“In coordination dynamics, the real-life coordination of neurons in the brain and the real-life coordinated actions of animals are cut, fundamentally, from the same dynamic cloth. Integrity is in turn preserved because it is never threatened. Psychophysical unity is undergirded at all levels by coordination dynamics.” -Maxine Sheets-Johnstone (1930– )

TMM

always~never

Only always, only never, either always or never, both always and never, always changing to never, never changing to always, between always and never, beyond always and never…

TMM

Discovery~invention

Only discovery, only invention, either discovery or invention, both discovery and invention, discovery changing to invention, invention changing to discovery, between discovery and invention, neither discovery nor invention, beyond discovery and invention.

Essay by Lisa Kimball

TMM

opposition~function

Only opposition, only function, either opposition or function, both opposition and function, opposition changing to function, function changing to opposition, between opposition and function, neither opposition nor function, beyond opposition and function…

TMM

Review of TCN

The Complementary Nature ~ A Review by Olaf Sporns “The division of our world (natural and social) into distinct contraries or opposites has become almost universal practice in most fields of human endeavor and inquiry, including science. Undeniably, imposing such divisions on space and time, wave and particle, order and chaos, action and perception, or organism and environment have enabled

>
THE METASTABILIAN MOVEMENT
The Metastabilian Movement
DAE
TMM
DP
TSQ
TCN
TSL
“~”
CD
JASK
TSS
Image-14

(TSS) "Sixth Sense” of The Complementary Nature, to the dynamic ‘yin~yang’ dance of inextricable complementary aspects. It is a modality present in every human nervous system. Ironically, most remain unaware, are ‘blind’ to its existence and crucial role it plays in their daily lives. The ‘Metastabilians’ seek to awaken and engage their Squiggle Sense to wield it in their life pursuits in any field, at any level of interest. Metastable brain~mind perception~action. The Squiggle Sense is a modality of ‘relative phase’—produced by and sensitive to the Coordination Dynamics. The Complementary Nature, the inextricability, complementarity of complementary pairs, the "coordinated dance" of complementary aspects. Once intentionally engaged, awareness of such inextricable dynamic complementarity is the essence of “Eureka moments”. A person that has awakened and engages their squiggle sense to be inspired by, explore, appreciate and intentionally engage the complementary nature of themselves and their world we call Metastabilian."

David Engstrøm
Doc Engstrom
DAE
TMM
DP
TSQ
TCN
TSL
“~”
CD
JASK
TSS
Pavlovic-Sphere-2016
Dražen Pavlović
DAE
TMM
DP
TSQ
facebook
TSL
“~”
CD
JASK
TSS